Los comentarios de los autores invitados son unica y exclusivamente de ellos. El Forastero de Ohio no sera responsable por los comentarios de autores invitados.

The comments written by invited writers are those of the invited writers and do not reflect the opinion of The Ohio Stranger.

Las opiniones de Jose Brechner son de Jose Brechner. Las opiniones

Morales 2010. El comienzo de la Bolivia Nazi
JOSE BRECHNER

“Toda adversidad trae consigo la semilla de un beneficio equivalente o mayor” –Napoleón Hill
Lo que somos y donde estamos, es resultado de las decisiones acertadas o erróneas que tomamos.
Si una sociedad decide demolerse colectivamente, es su elección.
Alemania optó así en el pasado, pagó durísimas consecuencias, no antes de haber causado sufrimientos y daños irreparables. Pero aprendió, y nunca más votaría por el nacionalsocialismo, que además quedó prohibido por sus fundamentos racistas.
Pero Bolivia, un país de mayoría ignorante que no sabe de lo que sucedió en Europa, está en camino hacia su harakiri nacional, y votará por la misma ideología que llevó a Hitler al poder.
Evo Morales, el soberbio magnate campesino inculto, será reelegido presidente, y pondrá en ejecución el más siniestro plan de gobierno que se haya experimentado en esta parte del mundo.
Su nueva constitución política, discrimina étnicamente a todos los que no son indios, haciéndoles pagar impuestos para sustentar a los demás.
Los indígenas en cambio, no tendrán obligaciones con el estado, y podrán establecer sus propias leyes tribales tanto en lo económico como en lo jurídico.
El linchamiento entrará en boga. La ocupación de tierras y viviendas será legal, y los vejámenes a blancos y mestizos estarán respaldados por el gobierno.
El narcotráfico está institucionalizado. Morales sigue siendo el jefe de los agricultores de coca, hoy convertidos en millonarios fabricantes de droga.
La felicidad boliviana que hará a Evo mandatario por segunda vez, proviene ciertamente de la cocaína, que esparce sus ganancias, llegando a los bolsillos de todos.
El fatídico programa gubernamental se implantará con la participación de venezolanos, cubanos, e iraníes.
Bolivia finalmente caerá bajo dominio absoluto de los reaccionarios neocomunistas y musulmanes, que la convertirán en la principal base terrorista de expansión continental.
Que Morales haya sido votado en 2005, puede justificarse, alegando que muchos no vieron la figura de Chávez por detrás. Pero después de tres vergonzosos años en los que el país perdió su dignidad y soberanía, los bolivianos no tuvieron suficiente, y reincidirán en su goce por la humillación.
Elegirán voluntariamente a sus represores. La libertad dejará de ser atributo ciudadano, y el caudillismo despiadado, con avenencia popular, tomará las bridas de la nación.
Hay pueblos que disfrutan de ser esclavos.
¿Cómo pueden ser tan ciegos? La respuesta es simple: Los ojos ven sólo aquello que la mente está capacitada para comprender. La incultura es general y la perspectiva a largo plazo no existe. El problema es prácticamente hemisférico.
Estas elecciones dejarán sangrientas huellas. La guerra civil no quedó descartada. Tampoco una invasión extranjera.
Si Evo Morales consigue mayoría de diputados y senadores, no habrá quien le ponga freno. Tendrá poderes autocráticos.
Su despotismo se impondrá con visos legales, para beneplácito de la progresía mundial, de lo contrario forzará exabruptos populares para amedrentar a la ciudadanía. Como hizo siempre.
¿Está preparada Bolivia para vivir en democracia? Creímos que sí. Lo ocurrido en la última década demuestra que no.
La democracia es la cereza sobre la crema de la cultura y la tolerancia. Es el premio a la civilización. No puede existir donde no hay educación, respeto al prójimo ni a las normas. El populismo es la degradación del sistema democrático.
Las traicioneras ambiciones personales de algunos de quienes gobernaron, o quisieron hacerlo, son las causantes de este devenir.
La culpa de Bolivia no está en el indígena analfabeto que no tiene criterio, sino en el ciudadano letrado que busca medrar con el acontecer político. Ése es el que tendrá su Núremberg cuando la pesadilla bolivariana llegue a su fin.

www.josebrechner.com

La violencia domestica afecta a los hombres como a las mujeres. Aunque reconozco que hubo injusticias contra las mujeres en el pasado en EEUU, las leyes favorece a las mujeres contra los hombres en la violencia domestica. Yo conozco un caso de un hombre de buena voluntad que tuvo problemas con su esposa. La mujer denuncio a su esposo y el se quedo preso, pobre, y desamparado. Los EEUU debe practicar los derechos humanos en la violencia domestica antes de acusar otros paises de violar los DDHH.

Venkatesan R. Itengar wrote an article for Merinews titled “Female Deadlier Than Male” on the 6th of August 2007. In the article, she discussed about the changing role in which power have slipped from men to women. While the author may have talked about India, the underwriter would like to talk about the shift of power from one sex to another in America.

It is true that women have been oppressed in the past by unequal laws which favoured men. The society that exists in the United States of America at one time even denied the right to vote for women. It was expected that men did all of the work while the women stayed at home. The evolution of women’s right in the United States of America is something that deserves to be praised.

The negative part of the rights of women has been the relegation of men to secondary roles and high expectations that men cannot comply with. There are certain women who watch soap operas, Hollywood Idols of the day, and Reality TV Shows. While people have accepted this as part of entertainment, these certain women have a tendency to compare their husbands with what is seen on TV and criticize the husband.

The laws that are written in the United States of America generally favour the woman over the man and are based on the expectations of the entertainment industry that has corrupted America.

The underwriter remembered a case of a homeless person who was once happily married and with children. He was very happy with his family yet his wife made unreasonable demands on him. She never forgave him for not being able to perform sex on the first night of their wedding. [It appears that there was a Hollywood Program that said if a "man does not perform sex on the first night, he either has another woman or is a homosexual".

There is a program on TV by a psychologist who states "Women if you do not have sex, it does not matter if the man works, dump him".

The same woman criticized the man for everything that happened in the world. He was accused of abandoning the wife and daughter when he went on a business trip or even a sports trip. The woman even told him to "keep quiet" in public and intervened in his personal mail, e mail, as well as telephone calls in case of "mistress" or "espionage". The accusations were baseless.

She asked for sex more and more from his husband and when he was impotent criticized him even more. The result was that the woman and her husband became ill physically and mentally.

Finally, the woman went to her Physician and accused the husband of "psychological torture" and used all of the excuses that she had... In America, any accusation of psychological torture is reported to the authorities. The end result was that the man lost his family, his house, his income, and his freedom.

He was able to recover his freedom and reputation but ended homeless since no one would employ him. There were people who knew the man as a just one and his plight inspired many to reject compromise or even form websites such as http://nomarriage.com. [No Marriage.com is a website dedicated to talking about women in the USA although from the perspective of the person who wrote it.]

There were people who saw the plight of the man and started to reject a society that has become self cantered and which favoured women abuse of men. These same people converted to Islam or other religions and concepts which are not compatible with US Society. The man himself remains homeless and told the underwater: “The women in America want sex, no sex, you are dumped” and has refuse offers of other women and has alienated himself from humanity.

In a relationship, there should be a democracy with the man and woman respecting each others individuality and personalities. A couple should not make unreasonable demands and they should live by themselves without other family members. If possible, the couple should go out and enjoy life instead of watching TV Shows that have destroyed the families. They should love and cherish each other daily.

It is hoped that one day, America and Western Society could wake up and think about a true equality of the sexes.

November 23, 2009

In November 2003, almost all Republican senators voted to pass the “Prescription Drug and Medicare Improvement Act of 2003.” That was the horrible humongous Medicare expansion that ended up costing about $1.2 trillion. It was a huge federal intrusion into health care. Republican darlings like Kay Bailey Hutchison and James Inhofe were among those who voted for it.

Wes Benedict
Executive Director
Libertarian National Committee

The Proposal”
             
When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to happen is they reduce their staff and workers. The remaining workers must find ways to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would be eliminated as well.

   Wall street, and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of “tough decision”, and his board of directors gives him a big bonus.

Our government should not be immune from similar risks.

Therefore:    
I. Reduce the size of the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members.

$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay/member/ yr. Not counting their expenses.)

$97,175,000 for elimination of their staff. (estimate $1.3 Million in staff per each member of the House, and $3 Million in staff per each member of the Senate every year)

$240,294 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork barrel ear-marks each year. (those members whose jobs are gon e. Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at $15 Billion/yr).

The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and improve efficiencies. It might even be in their best interests to work together for the good of our country!

We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep track of what your representative is doing.
I.        Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when the current number of representatives was established. (telephone, computers, internet, airline transportation, cell phones to name a few)

Note:
Congress did not hesitate to head home when it was a holiday, when the nation needed a real fix to the economic problems. Also, we have 3 senators that have not been doing their jobs for the past 18+ months (on the Presidential campaign trail) and still they all have been accepting full pay. This evidence supports justification for a reduction in senators & members of congress. We obvioulsly don’t need them to be at work on the job!  

Summary of opportunity:

$282,100, 000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff.

$150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff.

$59,675,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members.

$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members.

$8,073,383,400 per year, estimated total savings. (that’s 8-BILLION just to start!)

    As it is they all Now get full retirement after serving only ONE term.

Congratulations to Ohio for the wise decision in  legalizing casinos.

Felicidades para Ohio por la acertada decision en legalizar a los casinos.